Adult Man Pictured As A Baby On Nirvana’s Nevermind Album Appeals Ruling

The man who was pictured as a baby on the cover of one of the most memorable Nirvana albums is appealing his lawsuit against the band. Last week, a judge dismissed the lawsuit, which accused the grunge rock group of child pornography.

Los Angeles artist Spencer Elden, who is now 31, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in 2021, alleging that appearing naked as a 4-month-old infant on the cover of Nirvana’s 1991 album “Nevermind” caused him emotional distress and lost-learning capacity as an adult. 

Spencer Elden Who Was Pictured As A Baby On Nirvana’s Nevermind Album Is Appealing Court’s Ruling

Elden attempted to sue Nirvana’s former band members Krist Novoselic, Chad Channing, David Grohl, and Robert Fisher; the estate of Kurt Cobain; his widow Courtney Love and others for $150,000 each. 

Elden’s lawsuit claimed the Nirvana musicians “commercially marketed Spencer’s child pornography and leveraged the shocking nature of his image to promote themselves and their music at his expense,” according to the lawsuit.

Over 30 million copies of the Nirvana album on which Elden is depicted swimming naked in a pool, reaching for a superimposed dollar bill on a fish hook, have been sold worldwide.

United States District Judge Fernando M. Olguin ruled Friday that Elden had waited too long to file the lawsuit given that he had learned about the album cover more than 10 years ago. 

In January, the judge dismissed the case after attorneys for Elden missed a deadline to file an opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Elden’s lawyers had been allowed to file a second amended complaint concerning “alleged defects” in the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Nirvana’s attorneys’ motion to dismiss argued that Elden had spent three decades profiting from his depiction on the album cover. 

RELATED: R. Kelly’s Attorney Denounces Child Sex Abuse Case, Points Finger At A ‘Mob Justice Climate’ For His New Trial

“He has reenacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title ‘Nevermind’ tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-colored onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay, and he has used the connection to try to pick up women,” they said. 

Attorneys for Elden said the judge’s ruling was made based on “a misunderstanding of the statute of limitations.” 

“This unprecedented interpretation of Masha’s Law contravenes over fifteen years of well-settled precedent and the legislature’s intended purpose of the law,” Marsh Law Firm attorneys said in a statement. 

Masha’s Law is a 2005 federal law that gives victims of child pornography the right to sue parties who produce, distribute, or possess such images and materials. Its statute of limitations expires after the victim turns 28.

“Quite simply, under the statute and the caselaw the ongoing distribution of Spencer’s child pornography on Nirvana’s Nevermind album cover repeatedly violates the baby depicted on the cover even though he is now all grown up,” the statement said.

Nirvana’s attorneys added, “The Nevermind cover was created at a time when Spencer was a baby, and it is impossible for him to age out of this victimization while his image remains in distribution.”

RELATED: Harrisburg Man Faces Over 100 Charges For Horrific Child Rape And Sex Abuse Crimes

Bob Lewis, one of Elden’s attorneys, argues that Elden will be victimized as long as the image on the album cover continues to be distributed. 

And while attorneys for Nirvana have argued that Elden has embraced his depiction on the album and even profited from it by re-enacting the same pose as an adult, Lewis told CBS MoneyWatch that this behavior is consistent with how sex abuse victims deal with trauma.

“They oftentimes will embrace their abuser for quite some time, so it’s not uncommon for someone in his situation to be confused about what happened to him and not know exactly how to handle it,” Lewis said. “But in recent years, he’s come to terms with that and understands that having his pictures published like this has done him great harm, so we’re suing to prevent that.”

About Mamas Uncut

Mamas Uncut is THE online place for moms. We cover the latest about motherhood, parenting, and entertainment as well – all with a mom-focused twist. So if you're looking for parenting advice from real parents, we have plenty of it, all for moms from moms, and also experts. Because, at the end of the day, our mission is focused solely on empowering moms and moms-to-be with the knowledge and answers they’re looking for in one safe space.