Prince Harry is hoping to personally pay for police protection when in the UK but to do so, he has to take legal action.
The US-based father of two says his private security team does not have adequate jurisdiction abroad.
He lost his taxpayer-funded police security after stepping back from royal duties in 2020. And while Prince Harry says he wants to visit his home country with his family, he also needs to “ensure” their safety.
The application for a judicial review – a challenge in the High Court against the decision of a public body or government department – follows a security incident in London in July 2021 when Prince Harry’s car was chased by photographers as he left a charity event.
A legal representative for Prince Harry said the legal claim was filed in September “to challenge the decision-making behind the security procedures, in the hopes that this could be re-evaluated for the obvious and necessary protection required”.
Prince Harry wants to personally fund police protection, “not to impose on the taxpayer”, they said.
Now based in California, Prince Harry is arguing that his private security team cannot replicate the work of police protection in the UK — which has access to local intelligence and legal jurisdiction.
A statement said: “Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life. He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats.”
His legal representative revealed he offered to pay the costs of police protection in January 2020 at Sandringham, when talks with the Queen were being held over the Sussexes’ future role but the offer was dismissed.
“The UK will always be Prince Harry’s home and a country he wants his wife and children to be safe in. With the lack of police protection, comes too great a personal risk,” the statement said.
The two were forced to publicly announce they had in place “privately funded security arrangements” for their move to the US, after then-president Donald Trump said the country would not pay for their protection.
A government spokesperson said the UK’s “protective security system is rigorous and proportionate”.
They added: “It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements. To do so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”
With a background in the creative and educational fields, Amelia Finefrock is freelance writer, singer-songwriter and nanny based in Chicago.
Mamas Uncut is THE online place for moms. We cover the latest about motherhood, parenting, and entertainment as well – all with a mom-focused twist. So if you're looking for parenting advice from real parents, we have plenty of it, all for moms from moms, and also experts. Because, at the end of the day, our mission is focused solely on empowering moms and moms-to-be with the knowledge and answers they’re looking for in one safe space.