The Supreme Court reinstated the death sentence of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, this past Friday.
The court ruled 6-3 after discovering that the lower court was wrong when it tossed out Tsarnaev’s capital sentence in a 2020 decision over issues with jury selection and evidence that was excluded during the penalty phase of his trial.
Writing for the court’s conservative majority, Justice Clarence Thomas alleged that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to ask prospective jurors during Tsarnaev’s trial about their media consumption regarding the 2013 bombings near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. The majority also said the district court’s decision not to allow evidence involving Tsarnaev’s older brother, Tamerlan, was “reasonable.”
“Dzhokhar Tsarnaev committed heinous crimes. The Sixth Amendment nonetheless guaranteed him a fair trial before an impartial jury. He received one,” Thomas wrote for the court.
However, Justice Stephen Breyer, along with Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, wrote that the 1st Circuit “acted lawfully’ when it discovered that the district court should have allowed Tsarnaev to introduce evidence involving his older brother’s alleged involvement in three murders on September 11, 2011, the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Breyer wrote how the district court should conduct a new sentencing proceeding.
“I have written elsewhere about the problems inherent in a system that allows for the imposition of the death penalty,” he said. “This case provides just one more example of some of those problems.”
The Biden administration had requested the Supreme Court to restore Tsarnaev’s death sentences, despite President Biden opposing the death penalty. In addition, the Justice Department had reinstated a moratorium on federal executions in July.
Tsarnaev’s attorneys acknowledge how he and Tamerlan Tsarnaev detonated two homemade devices near the finish line of the Boston Marathon nearly a decade ago, which left three dead and many more injured. But Tsarnaev’s lawyers argued Tamerlan Tsarnaev was the mastermind behind the attack, and the younger Tsarnaev followed his brother’s lead.
The two brothers attempted to flee Massachusetts in the wake of the bombing. This led to a four-day manhunt that put Boston and the surrounding areas on lockdown. Tsarnaev was arrested by police after he was discovered hiding out in a boat behind a house in Watertown, Massachusetts. And Tamerlan Tsarnaev died in a shootout with police during their pursuit of the two brothers.
Tsarnaev was convicted on 30 counts in 2015, including three counts of using a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death. The jury recommended, and the district court imposed, the death penalty on six of 17 capital counts.
The 1st Circuit upheld almost all of Tsarnaev’s convictions, except three, and it invalidated the capital sentences and ordered a new sentencing proceeding in the year 2020. The lower court ruled the district judge who had overseen Tsarnaev’s trial abused his discretion by rejecting requests to ask prospective jurors specific questions about pretrial media coverage they may have seen or read about Tsarnaev’s case.
However, the lower court also found the district court make a misstep during the penalty phase of the trial by excluding evidence that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was allegedly involved in a triple murder two years prior to the Boston Marathon bombing — on the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks — which would have strengthened the central theory from Tsarnaev’s lawyers that he had acted under his older brother’s influence.
The Trump administration requested the Supreme Court review the 1st Circuit’s decision, arguing a new sentencing proceeding would place significant burdens on the victims of the 2013 bombing.
With a background in the creative and educational fields, Amelia Finefrock is freelance writer, singer-songwriter and nanny based in Chicago.
Mamas Uncut is THE online place for moms. We cover the latest about motherhood, parenting, and entertainment as well – all with a mom-focused twist. So if you're looking for parenting advice from real parents, we have plenty of it, all for moms from moms, and also experts. Because, at the end of the day, our mission is focused solely on empowering moms and moms-to-be with the knowledge and answers they’re looking for in one safe space.